However, the concept described differs: it isn’t about seeing the outcomes of combining drug A with drug B, but, when A fails to function, B is administered, and if this also fails we return to the starting place and initiate treatment with a combined mix of both . This plan could offer an unprecedented key to multiplying treatment plans. In the precise case of the study, we administered trastuzumab ; when the tumour continued growing we used pertuzumab so when the cancers continued to progress we administered the two together.. A giant little step in cancer treatment opening up new therapeutic horizons The data, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, demonstrate that by combining two drugs that had recently been used on a patient during the past but had stopped working, they boost each other’s efficacy and at exactly the same time manage to breakdown the patient’s resistance to each of them individually, presenting a third potential treatment option for clinically advanced metastatic tumours.Congressman Stupak expects additional meetings this complete week and remains to be optimistic that language can be worked out. On the flip side, Stupak has said at least 10 co-workers will oppose a bill that doesn’t include them. If both claims are true, that would make it almost impossible for party leaders in the House to get the 216 votes they need to move the measure . Roll Contact: Leadership aides are skeptical of Stupak’s count and believe they are able to hang on to about 50 percent the number that the Michigan Democrat says are in his corner. Commerce and Energy Chairman Henry Waxman , a key supporter of Rep. Bart Stupak’s anti-abortion vocabulary designed for the ongoing healthcare bill, said Tuesday night that he’s happy the Senate abortion language prohibits federal funding of abortions and can likely vote for the expenses.