1 The retractions came only weeks after BioMed Central.

When all manuscripts managed by these editors were examined, a complete of 32 content were identified that were accepted thanks to the comments of fake reviewers. It really is unclear what motivated the guest editors to engage in such fraud, nor provides it been determined if the authors of the manuscripts involved participated in the deception at all. There are several lessons to be learned from these instances of peer-review and peer-reviewer fraud. One is usually that the electronic manuscript-handling systems that a lot of journals make use of are as vulnerable to exploitation and hacking as additional data systems.Kaiser Family members Foundation. Kaiser Health Information, an unbiased news service editorially, is a program of the Kaiser Family members Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research firm unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

ACP’s Medical Laboratory Evaluation program accepted by CAP’s accreditation program The American College of Doctors’ Medical Laboratory Evaluation program recently gained approval to provide certain analytes for use with the College of American Pathologists Laboratory Accreditation Plan . The CAP accreditation system is an internationally-recognized plan that uses even more rigorous criteria than regulatory compliance to help labs achieve the best standard of excellence.